The Venus Project Foundation, an arts, sciences and educational, non-profit 501c3, national organization

The Venus Project Foundation, an arts, sciences and educational, non-profit 501c3, national organization.

 

Richard Gage, an architect himself, represents over 2,200 architects and engineers, who have studied and researched the tragic events of 9/11 and the science of what brought down (controlled preplanned demolition) of the three (3) World Trade Center: North Tower, South Tower and building number 7 on September 11, 2001.

 

In December of 1989, due to the ending of the COLD WAR, the Washington Post reported that: “Military experts from previous administrations told Congress today that the $300 BILLION annual Pentagon budget could be safely cut in half over the next decade”.

 

In September 2000, The Project for the New American Century wrote, “Preserving the desirable strategic situation in which the United States now finds itself requires a globally preeminent military capability . . . the process of transformation . . . is likely to be a long one, absent of some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”

On September 11, 2001, the self inflected tragedy struck. 9/11 was the new “Pearl Harbor” event necessary to not only preserve the Pentagon’s budget, but to  Cick here for more details

DHS Insider Warns: “It’s Already Begun. You’re Seeing It Now.” :: The Last Great Stand

DHS Insider Warns: “It’s Already Begun. You’re Seeing It Now.” :: The Last Great Stand.

In December of 2012 we published a report from the Northeast Intelligence Networkdetailing a possible set of scenarios and timelines. In the report, Doug Hagmann interviewed an anonymous DHS Insider with information that was absolutely mind blowing.

 

The Insider claimed that in the Spring of 2013 life for the average American would begin to change significantly. He advised that these changes would be revealed after a large collapse in the price of precious metals, which like other financial instruments, were being manipulated by the powers that be. The claims were dismissed by many as ridiculous, with suggestions that the “anonymous source” must be a fake if he won’t even reveal his name.

 

Given the blowback anonymous sources in recent years have experienced – Bradley Manning, Juliane Assange, and now Edward Snowden to name a few – is there any question as to why any Insider leaking information would want to remain anonymous?

That aside, consider not who the Insider is, but rather  Read more here